AUSTRALIAN VETERAN MATTERS
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Wednesday26February2020

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Wiltshire CEO of Conspiracy Theory Central
2,371 Posts in 149 Topics by 217 Members
Latest Member: Sweesiultew
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  AUSTRALIAN VETERAN MATTERS
|-+  AUSTRALIAN VETERAN MATTERS FORUM
| |-+  THE MAD GALAHS FORUM--This forum does not necessarily reflect AVMs opinion. CLICK HERE FOR AVMS OPINION
| | |-+  Mad Galah's fear the truth
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Mad Galah's fear the truth  (Read 16347 times)
Zion
Administrator
Active Member


Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 372


« Reply #5 on: Sunday03July2011 »

WARNING! This is a long post and you will need concentration and comprehension to digest it. BUT it will be worth it.
AVM


The Allen Petersen email list is like a flame to moths. Mad and bad moths who are usually fakes and wannabes. The wannabes on the Petersen email list just keep growing and they include these hapless, sad fakes who just love the free for all Petersen gives them to peddle their lies and their attempts to reinvent themselves.

Tate
http://www.austvetmatters.net/tate.html
http://www.austvetmatters.net/updates.html

Muller
http://www.austvetmatters.net/muller.html
http://www.anzmi.net/muller/muller.html

Westerway
http://www.austvetmatters.net/westerway.html
http://www.austvetmatters.net/terrywesterway.html

Corse
http://www.austvetmatters.net/corse.html
http://www.austvetmatters.net/barrycorse.html

Briggs
http://www.austvetmatters.net/briggs.html
http://www.austvetmatters.net/davidbriggs.html

Joyce
http://www.austvetmatters.net/joyce.html
http://www.austvetmatters.net/keithjoyce.html

Moon
http://www.austvetmatters.net/moon.html
http://www.anzmi.net/moon/moon.html

Wiltshire
http://www.austvetmatters.net/wiltshire.html

Clampett
Clampett is a newcomer to the Petersen list and he uses the nom de plume Unknown Free Range Celebrity  at email freedomtoo@bigpond.com
The long list of wannabes on the Petersen email list goes on and on and on.


The following email was distributed by Petersen on 3 July 2011 and you can read clearly the input from some of the frauds which AVM has mentioned.


----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Petersen
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Cc: Wayne Penniall (VVCS) ; Ian Campbell (DVA Sec) ; Shane Carmody
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 1:37 AM
Subject: SMH Article - DVA a SICK JOKE ? **POSTS

From: Penniall, Wayne (ACT)
To: petersaj@bigpond.net.au
Cc: Campbell, Ian ; Carmody, Shane
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:16 PM
Subject:  SMH article

Dear Mr Petersen
Thanks for your email yesterday regarding the media report that the psychological records of two Australian Defence Force members were released to Defence prosecutors and used against them.
I can assure you that these were not counselling records from the VVCS -Veterans and Veterans Families Counselling Service.
I do not have any details of the nature of the records mentioned in the article and would suggest any comments on the nature of these records be addressed to Dept of Defence.  I do not consider it is useful to speculate on this article.
Kind regards

Wayne Penniall
Wayne Penniall
National Manager
VVCS - Veterans and Veterans Families Counselling Service
Phone (02) 6289 6397
Fax (02) 6289 4702
Mobile 0411 281 735
A service founded by Vietnam veterans

G'day Wayne,
Like to comment on this article before it is mass circulated? As a client of VVCS, I find this very disturbing. regards, Allen

From: Bazil.b
To: freedomtoo@bigpond.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 12:31 PM
Subject: SMH Article - DVA a SICK JOKE ? **POSTS

I agree with you mate...  same has happened to many of us.. also Doc Killer and Doc Bain are two wolves in sheeps clothing who have a lot to answer for some day...

I was accused to my face by Killer and others that my case was false...  strange that years later the Commanders Diaries verified my statements but DVA and the review board didn't want to know...No apologies..

Re Bain ...  doesn't want to work with anyone with suicide intervention skills as he is a lone player who loves his name in lights...  As a trained suicide intervention Councellor, I was totally ignored by him when I offered to assist on his well paid program via VVCS..

We are surrounded by these Oxygen thieves and thats the pity...

Bazza  QLD


From: Noel P Muller
To: 'Allen Petersen'
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 11:34 AM
Subject: Re SMH Article - DVA a SICK JOKE  **POSTS
I am encouraged to admit that my secrets are pretty safe with at the very least one of the VVCS Counsellors. Within a couple of minutes into the COUNSELLING SESSION he was fast asleep and remained thus for the entire hour that I sat there. I personally could not believe what was going on other wise I would have got up and walked out but I thought that I would see exactly what would transpire. He concluded the session by standing up and saying “Well, we all have problems to live with so you better start looking for ways to handle yours”. The man was a very recently retired RAN Lieutenant Commander apparently with only one leg & one prosthetic operating as a counsellor (I would question upon what training & authority) in VVCS Adelaide. I rang and spoke with the Female Senior Operative (at least that is what she said she was) and told her about the incident and she asked did I wish to lodge a complaint. I asked her would it do any good and she stated “Probably not” but we do take these things seriously. He is now over at BLACKBURN HOUSE in the employ of DVA.

In another issue with the same office I was taken on by a FEMALE COUNSELLOR and I was troubled as the subject matter covered my lack of ability (due to Medications) in matters sexual. After a few minutes she declared the meeting over and stood up to open the door & usher me out. You may understand why I never go near VVCS anymore.
Best regards, Noel
Noel P Muller
navy4@optusnet.com.au

From: Unknown Free Range Celebrity
To: 'Allen Petersen'
Cc: wayne.penniall@ ; Ian.Campbell@ ; 'Graeme.Killer@ ; roderickbain@gmail.com ;
Ian.Watt@ ; Neil James ADA
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: SMH article

This is one of the germs, down below, I wrote about.

John Peter Dominic Rigano, who seemed to be preoccupied when I was seeing him, is the prick I wrote about earlier.
This is the prick that DVA accepted as the “authority” plus the arseholes from WriteWay Research.

Let Neil Bloody James tell us a little more about the good work done by DVA and his “Australian Defence Association”, all the experts on everything they have never been involved in.
Cheers,
LEONARD CLAMPETT
Economist & Vietnam Veteran


Shrink sent to slammer
Margo Zlotkowski
Thursday, April 30, 2009 © The Cairns Post

A FORMER Cairns psychiatrist whose "therapy" for a boy patient involved indecently touching him was jailed for nine months yesterday.

John Peter Domenic Rigano, 59, now an itinerant fruit-picker after losing his job, his practice, his reputation and his marriage over the six long-standing counts of indecent dealing, kept his head bowed through most of yesterday’s sentence hearing in the Cairns District Court.

The charges relate to offences committed mainly in Rigano’s former McLeod St consulting rooms between March 1993 and January 1995 on the same boy, aged 13 and 14 at the time, who had sought help for anxiety problems.

The court heard all the offences involved Rigano massaging and masturbating the boy, except one where the former doctor sat him on his lap while he was driving and pressed himself against the boy.
Crown prosecutor Gelma Meoli, who asked for the maximum penalty of five years’ jail, said Rigano had shown no remorse and attempted to shift blame on to his young victim.
"What he has done is the worst possible example of this type of offending and one could not imagine a more serious breach of trust," Ms Meoli said.

Quoting from Rigano’s own words in an interview, she said: "I just looked at it as us mucking around and having fun". Rigano also told the boy he too was sexually abused as a child and asked him to "imagine what you’re going through and magnify that by 50 or 100".

But Judge Michael Shanahan said his reading of Rigano’s words suggested some insight into what the boy suffered.

Rigano’s barrister Tony Collins said Rigano, deregistered as a doctor in 1999 as a result of another complaint, "lived under the poverty line".
Rigano was sentenced to three and a half years’ jail suspended after nine months.

Doing time: John Peter Domenic Rigano (in 2003) who was sentenced to jail yesterday for nine months.

From: Unknown Free Range Celebrity
To: 'Allen Petersen'
Cc: wayne.penniall@ ; Ian.Campbell@ ; 'Dr Ian Watt (DoD)' ; Graeme.Killer@ ; roderickbain@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 6:36 AM
Subject: Re SMH article - DVA is a Sick Joke..

G’day Allen,
This is on top of the fact that your private conversations with psychiatrists are handed to DVA, because it pays the bill.

Every digger should be told this, I was not. When I read the trick cyclist’s report years later I was horrified to see that almost everything I said to the tricko was reported as about 180 degrees from what I actually said. He has since been in jail for sexually assaulting a couple of his patients, one female and one male, and now works as an itinerant fruit picker and has lost his family, business assets and just about everything else. As he should. It became clear later that he was under stress and simply was not listening to what I said, as he was, at the time, under investigation about a complaint from a female patient of some 30 years previously, who claimed he had made sexual advances to her whilst she was his patient. He took himself of the Register voluntarily not long after I had seen him and was then later arrested, charged, convicted and jailed for sexually assaulting  14 year old boy, in his rooms, under his care.

However, this germ was depended upon by DVA to refuse my claims. DVA is a sick joke!

Further to that a couple of criminals, ex Army colonels, who ran an outfit called WriteWay Research, used this germ’s report to refute almost everything I claimed and DVA refused my claims. My research now demonstrates that WriteWay Research did no research in my case whatsoever, and I now have almost all the official evidence to show that, Only some ten years too late. I imagine that WriteWay Research was paid multi-hundreds of thousands of dollars (millions) of tax payers money over many years to write bullshit reports and assist DVA to keep entitlements from those who should get them.
Fuck DVA and all the arseholes in it who seem to think that any money paid out comes from their own pockets.
Cheers,
LEONARD CLAMPETT
Economist & Vietnam Veteran


From: The Australia Defence Association
To: 'Allen Petersen' ; 'Terry Westerway'
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:38 AM
Subject: Re Commando Charges

Dear Terry et al,
Sorry for the delay in replying but I have been overseas again doing what the ADA is meant to do.

Morale among our troops continues to be very good. Diggers of all ranks and corps continue to talk to the ADA very freely because they value the Association’s efforts to defend the ADF from misinformed or ignorant criticism but criticise Defence (and others) where it is warranted.

As to Terry’s questions below they are based on some false assumptions and him apparently not keeping up with public debate.

First, we have never somehow “poured scorn on those who dared to question both the process and the aim of the exercise” in terms of the charges. We have, as is our role as the relevant public-interest watchdog organisation, criticised those who have offered opinions contrary to the facts and the law. We have also criticised the DMP at times and everyone involved in the process taking so long. A quick check of our website and any email correspondence on this topic would confirm this.

Second, at the time that the senior Judge Advocate (previously the senior judge of the defunct Australian Military Court) dismissed the charges against the first two commandos during the pre-trial hearings, and again after the more recent DMP statement about these charges,  the ADA noted that we would be reserving comment on the first matter until the charges against the third member are decided one way or the other (so as not to prejudice his right to a fair trial, etc).

Third, we have also criticised on legal equity grounds that access to individual psychological records by the ADF Investigative Service has apparently been allowed without a court order. We have also noted that access to such records, even by a court order, may have to be forbidden in future on operational effectiveness and perhaps duty-of-care grounds. We have also raised this with the ADF directly.
Fourth, we have continued to fight the tabled legislation to establish the new Military Court of Australia, and again abolish courts martial (as occurred under the failed AMC legislation), because the ADA continues to believe that ADF personnel fighting a war overseas have a right to be tried by their professional peers (with an understanding of war) in a court martial and not by a civilian federal court judge sitting, with no jury, back here in Australia. Again this criticism of the bill can be read on our website.

Finally, is it not somewhat puzzling to you all, at all, that the numerous veterans of all former ranks and backgrounds who regularly provide positive feedback to the ADA disagree with Allen’s odd opinion?
Neil James
Executive Director
Australia Defence Association


From: Terry Westerway
To: Australian Defence Association ; Neil James
Cc: Allen Petersen
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:23 PM
Subject:  SMH article

Neil, (James)

You have repeatedly jumped to the defence of the DMP and the process involved, inferring that it was "fair and reasonable" and that it would "prove" something or other about Australian soldiers. You have also excoriated and poured scorn on those who dared to question both the process and the aim of the exercise.

But, you seem to have been very quiet - to the point of invisibility - on the subject since the Military Court threw the charges out. And now we have the little "bon mot" below (highlighted in red). Yes, maybe such things as psyche records are available upon subpoena - but precisely HOW did the investigators get the records 12 months before any charges were laid? Normally, a subpoena can only be issued after court proceedings are issued.

Care to comment?

Terry Westerway NSW

From: Terry Westerway
Date: 28/06/2011 2:12:50 PM
To: Phil Holder Cc: Bernie McGurgan
Subject: Re SMH article = Further Comment!

I know that I have said this before but, to repeat myself, perhaps everyone should understand that records (including personnel files from CARO) that are over 30 years old (soon to be reduced to 20 years and later to 10 years old) are freely available to "the general public" at a minimal cost - via The National Archives. The National Archives do NOT require an "inquirer" to give any reason for wanting the records (much less a valid reason) and regardless of the use to which those records are put by the "inquirer" (or anyone else to whom the "inquirer" passes such records) - The National Archives will absolutely protect the identity of the "inquirer" upon the grounds of "privacy". Both the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Privacy Commissioner are unable to help with discovering the identity of the "inquirer" (again, regardless of what the "inquirer" has done with the records obtained).

Supposedly, medical records are kept separately - but I am not at all convinced of that because I suspect that CARO simply bundles up every scrap they have and sends it off to National Archives, NAA (for distribution to the "inquirer").

Records such as psychiatric reports might be legally available from DVA etc., but I understand that they normally require the service of a subpoena for the records. And it is legally possible to object to subpoenaed information being made available. BUT, you must first know that records have been subpoenaed. In the case of the guy below, I suspect that the subpoena was served on DVA and they did not bother to tell the guy (otherwise his lawyers might have been able to lodge an objection).

As for the commandos records, they say that they do not know whether the records were subpoenaed or not. Well, according to the SMH story, the records were obtained by investigators up to 12 months prior to charges being laid. Tell me, precisely how does one obtain a subpoena for evidence in a court proceedings that has not already been commenced? It sounds very much like the investigators have simply gone along and demanded the records and been handed the same, without question.

Terry Westerway, NSW

From: Bernie
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 3:36 PM
Subject: SMH article = Further Comment!

Presume you are all aware of this? Bernie

I know that I have said this before but, to repeat myself, perhaps everyone should understand that records (including personnel files from CARO) that are over 30 years old (soon to be reduced to 20 years and later to 10 years old) are freely available to "the general public" at a minimal cost - via The National Archives. The National Archives do NOT require an "inquirer" to give any reason for wanting the records (much less a valid reason) and regardless of the use to which those records are put by the "inquirer" (or anyone else to whom the "inquirer" passes such records) - The National Archives will absolutely protect the identity of the "inquirer" upon the grounds of "privacy". Both the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Privacy Commissioner are unable to help with discovering the identity of the "inquirer" (again, regardless of what the "inquirer" has done with the records obtained).
 
Supposedly, medical records are kept separately - but I am not at all convinced of that because I suspect that CARO simply bundles up every scrap they have and sends it off to National Archives (for distribution to the "inquirer").
 
Records such as psychiatric reports might be legally available from DVA etc, but I understand that they normally require the service of a subpoena for the records. And it is legally possible to object to subpoena'd information being made available. BUT, you must first know that records have been subpoena'd. In the case of the guy below, I suspect that the subpoena was served on DVA and they did not bother to tell the guy (otherwise his lawyers might have been able to lodge an objection).
 
As for the commandoes records, they say that they do not know whether the records were subpoena'd or not. Well, according to the SMH story, the records were obtained by investigators up to 12 months prior to charges being laid. Tell me, precisely how does one obtain a subpoena for evidence in a court proceeding that has not already been commenced? It sounds very much like the investigators have simply gone along and demanded the records and been handed the same, without question.
 
Terry Westerway  NSW

From: Bernie
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 8:49 AM
Subject: SMH article = Further Comment!

Just as a matter of interest...and you may like to make this common knowledge BUT WITHOUT MY NAME ON IT
in 1995 my wife of 26 years left me 3 years after I started treatment for PTSD, during the court proceedings in the Family Court she/her Solicitor/Barrister called for my DVA records including the Psychiatric reports.

She did this to gain some ground in her shit fight against me.

Her lawyers had open access to all my information and files.

XXXXXXX

From: Phil Holder
To: Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:18 AM
Subject: SMH article

The purple highlighted part below may end up having defence personnel records NOT BEING RELEASED UNLESS THE PERSON INVOLVED AGREES TO THE PERSON WHO MADE THE REQUEST. We can live in hope!. Phil Holder, NSW


From: Allen Petersen
To: Wayne Penniall (VVCS)
Cc: Ian Campbell (DVA Sec) ; Dr Ian Watt (DoD) ; Dr Graeme Killer ; Dr Rod Bain
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 11:58 AM
Subject: SMH article

G'day Wayne,  (National Manager, VVCS)

Like to comment on this article before it is mass circulated? As a client of VVCS, I find this very disturbing. regards, Allen
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Soldiers could avoid counselling after files used against them
Dan Oakes
June 28, 2011
Counselling records used as evidence in a prosecution case may deter future soldiers from seeking counselling.

AUSTRALIAN special forces soldiers fighting in Afghanistan could shun counselling after the psychological records of two commandos cleared over the deaths of civilians were taken by Defence prosecutors for use as evidence against them.

The Herald believes Defence Force investigators seized records of counselling the two men received before and after the event, in which six Afghan civilians - including five children - were killed during a disastrous night raid on a compound in February 2009.

Manslaughter charges against the two soldiers were thrown out by a military judge last month, and the military prosecutor announced last week that she would not lay further charges.

A number of Defence sources have told the Herald that special forces soldiers have been horrified to hear that the records were handed over, and that some have since said they will not see psychologists, in case their records are also used against them.

Civilian psychologists and medical doctors are obliged to hand over patient records when there is a legal obligation to do so, but they must be subpoenaed by the court. It is unclear what the process is within Defence.

It is understood that the prosecutors had the mens' psychological records for a year before telling the Defence Forces, but there was nothing the prosecution deemed relevant enough to use as evidence.

''If you come back from operations and you're feeling uncomfortable, you will hold that in, rather than go to the psychologists,'' one source said.

''That could be a problem, because you could be deployed on future operations without being counselled. If you don't report it, you could also have problems later making a claim with the Department of Veterans Affairs.''

Special forces troops - predominantly Special Air Service troopers and commandos - spend weeks on end operating in the mountains of southern Afghanistan. They are fighting battles against insurgents, and two SAS troopers have won Victoria Crosses in Afghanistan.

The average number of Afghan deployments among them is five or six, but some have done up to 10, leading to concerns that they are becoming mentally and physically worn out as the war approaches its 11th year. ''Unlike after Vietnam, the army will retain these personnel and have to deal with it in-house,'' a source said. ''The US indicators are that we will have huge mental health issues.''

Sources have also said there has been alarm within the Defence Force about the fact a newspaper was able to obtain the Army record of Queensland Liberal National Party leader Campbell Newman under freedom of information laws.

The newspaper then published excerpts, including unflattering assessments of his leadership abilities.

The decision by the military prosecutor to charge the two commandos caused anger within the Defence Force, particularly as the charges were dismissed before they even went to trial. A lieutenant colonel in overall command of the operation has also been charged with offences linked to the raid.

In a statement released by the regimental association last week, the two soldiers said they would carry the burden of the deaths for the rest of their lives.

''We need no reminding that our actions contributed to the death of five innocent children,'' the two soldiers said.

Defence was asked to comment for this story, but did not respond by deadline.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/soldiers-could-avoid-counselling-after-files-used-against-them-20110627-1gnfq.html#ixzz1QUlG644S





The  shame is there are people one would think of as intelligent and respected members of the Veteran community who keep trying to reason with these clowns and idiots and one would think that people such as Neil James of the ADA would know better than to try and reason with fakes and fools with agendas.

Recently an article appeared in the media in which it was claimed that some Defence medical records had been retrieved for use by the prosecution over the alleged criminal offences which were allegedly committed in Afghanistan. Not being a list to hold back from creating hysterical half truths, down right lies and mischief the Petersen email list's chief propagandists leapt to the fore and became involved in a campaign of childish misrepresentation and gobbly gook. The records referred to in the media report were Defence records and NOT VVCS records.

Chief among the distorters and propagandists was our old legal eagle in Chief Terrence Westerway,Naval hero and killer of hundreds of Indonesians Noel Molly Muller  and the newcomer LEONARD CLAMPETT

You can read all about Westerways and Muller’s inglorious military service above but Clampett is not on our website....YET!

Clampett refers to himself as an Economist among other things. However he is not! Clampett is well known in DVA circles as are the other fakes. Clampett bought his own Ecomonics Degree at a do it yourself online University and you can read about him here.




Courts told go easy on powers | The Australian http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/courts-told-go-easy-on-powers/story-e6frg97x-1225797161350


13 Nov 2009 ... One, 65 year-old Leonard Clampett, was arrested at home, handcuffed and taken to court, where he was then sent directly to jail. ...
www.theaustralian.com.au/.../story-e6frg97x-1225797161350  - Similar

Two jailed over electoral dispute - Queensland - BrisbaneTimes http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queensland/two-jailed-over-electoral-dispute/2008/07/09/1215282923182.html

•  10 Jul 2008 ... Meanwhile, one of Noah's supporters, self-ascribed "bush lawyer" Leonard William Clampett, 64, was jailed for 28 days on two charges of ...


Clampett has a wannabe economics degree from a self styled non recognised Uni here http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/index.htm

This is Clampett. Another wannabe ....Petersen draws them like moths to a flame.

This is the Panacea-BOCAF division for education and reform of the Australian reserve banking system. For those outside of Australia who wish to learn how they can reform their system please visit our banking reform start page.


The Reserve Bank of Australia

“The issue that has swept down the centuries and must be fought sooner or later is, The People versus The Banks”-- Lord Acton John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton (1834-1902) First Baron Acton of Aldenham.

"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they should, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit. --Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England and the second richest man in Britain in the 1920's, speaking at the University of Texas in 1927.

The Panacea faculty of economics deals with educational material for banking reform. Panacea provides educational mediums, conducts educational workshops and provides a secure legal way for the public to ensure progress. This specific sector relates to the Australian banking system and to the Australian public. The Panacea Faculty of economics provides the only way for the Australian pubic to obtain interest-free and fee-free loans.

We are the only educational facility publicly reporting these facts in as much capacity specifically regarding how interest-free and fee-free loans are possible.

Also educating how all money is borrowed from private banks in order to get it into circulation, all money is a debt and cannot be used to pay another debt.

The Australian government has the full power and capability to issue its own interest free and fee free currency with out the need for the intervention and system of the private banks. Banks merely serve a book keeping role and are needed for nothing else.

The Panacea Faculty of economics is run by our very own a veteran researcher of over 35 years, Leonard Clampett, an ex-Army returned serviceman and retired Airline Transport Pilot. Len has written 3 books detailing how the money system is run, how specifically it can be revived and how the Australian public can do it.


Len conducting the first faculty of economics workshop in Brisbane

All it needs is for The People to know and understand that we can all have interest-free, fee-free loans for housing, business and personal use, right now, and the banks can make the same profits they make now, and still lend in a prudential manner. The new system is laid out in Leonard Clampett’s new book “Out of the Red and Into the Black”.

The power to “create credit” or "create money” is unnecessarily in private hands when constitutionally it can be restored into the hands of government for the people, where money manipulation, usury and the burden of interest and fees are not possible. Interest-free and fee-free loans are possible and a safe pecuniary management can only result through the following system, facts prove it clearly and unequivocally.

The unique advantage of the Panacea Faculty of Economics is not only in the caliber of our educational material, but in providing the medium for the public to MANDATE (order/ensure) the system changes over and this cannot come at a more critically important time.


Deep concerns- Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) Governor Glenn Stevens  warns that interest rates are likely to rise again. Picture: Ray Strange

The problems that Australian's face with our system of allowing private banks to issue credit created "out of thin air” and providing debt based financial instability is currently being addressed. This is a progressive process.

The Australian Panacea Faculty of Economics provides a SECURE legal way with legal MANDATES that is intended to motivate signatures from this education. Education that frees you from the current "fraud" that is the Australian system operated free of cost by the private banks. Education beats legislation hands down every time.

How would you like interest-free and fee-free loans?


Most will not know that:

1) The only service banks perform is bookkeeping.
2) The private banks only exist to make profit.
3) Banks never loan money, they advance credit, credit which they create in their computers.
4) Banks buy real estate by “honouring” their own cheques.
5) Banks create credit out of thin air, just the way the government could do it, but has allowed the banks to do it in a exponential profit at our expense.

The Panaea faculty of economics has sent letter's to the CEO's of 13 major banks in Australia along with the Creation of money quotes. There is no excuse for therm to not knowing how a better system can serve the public. These records can be provided upon request. contact us

Leonard Clampett also runs the stop the pain now web-site which is an additional mirror to the themes and content presented on this site.


Click for Website

By purchasing this book through the stop the pain now web-site you will get a Mandate form included with which we can all implement this new economic system that will free us from horrendous debt. We consider te purchase a donation to help spread the education - Can you help?

For those who are unable to purchase the book and get a mandate form to sign and send in, and "just want to get it done", you can download the mandate form at the link provided.

EASY - Mandate form instrucitons

1)Down load and print the form

2) Sign it

3) Send it to the Panacea faculty of economics

Address- Care of Leonard Clampett
50 Harding Street
Enoggera Qld 4051
Australia.

Download - Australian Mandate form

If you do not live in Australia you can still help, here is an international mandate form which still counts and supports this goal.

Download - International Mandate Form

This information needs your help to spread effectively through blogs, friends, community groups and the media. Please help forward this to your government members and to as many as possible. We are all needed to work together, that is the very essence of the Panacea spirit.

Panacea continues to do educational workshops and can make available Len's educational workshop DVD covering this subject matter FREE to any educational institute or member of any government - contact us. If your a member of the public and would like to get a hold of this DVD, please note any donation helps us continue to spread this education.

Contact the faculty of Economic's (Click Image For Email)

Some relative FACTS.

-Under the Panacea faculty of economics "stop the pain now" Mandate for interest-free and fee-free loans - It will prevent politicians from ignoring the welfare of The People. Currently the politicians are not ensuring that the government creates all money required for all purposes of government. The parliament allows private bankers to do what the government should do, and the private bankers make enormous profits from that and even charge the government interest on the money the government borrows from those same private banksters.

-All “money”/credit comes into common circulation as a result of private bank lending and has done so in Australia since 1924.

-All “money” begins life as credit created by private banks.

-All “money” begins as a bank deposit created at the time a loan is advanced.

-Banks never loan money, they advance credit.

-No bank does, has ever, or could ever, make a profit by accepting deposits and on-lending them.

-Banks are manufacturers of credit bookkeepers and nothing more.

-Any money loaned through accepting it by way of “investment” and on-lending it, is the province of financial intermediaries.

-Banks are not, and have never been, financial intermediaries.

-The RBA does not create any money, it mints coins under contract and prints notes

-Money creation is in private hands in Oz. The government DOES not create any money.

-94% of all money in circulation in Australia is in the form of credit created by the private banks.

-The other 6% is coins and notes and the only way you can get coins and notes is if you give the bank back some of the credit you borrowed from the banks.

-The banks get the notes and coins as COST from the Reserve bank by issuing credit to the Reserve Bank.

-If a bank requires a $100 note from the RBA it will issue the RBA credit for the amount, which is about 6 cents and in return get the polymer note, which the bank will the trade to you for $100 worth of credit from you. Neat con, isn’t it?

- The RBA is broke because each month its assets exactly equal its liabilities, whereas the private banks B.A.G (Bank Asset Growth) increases with every passing moment.

Noteable related quotes

“Men stumble over the truth from time to time but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing happened.”
-- Winston Leonard Spenser Churchill

"Capital must protect itself in every way," through combination and through legislation. Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of LAW the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law, applied by the central power of wealth, under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders." -- "Banker's Manifest", for private circulation among leading bankers only, taken from the Civil Servants' Year Book, "The Organizer" of January, 1934


It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.
-- Henry Ford

“The government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.”
-- Abraham Lincoln, 16th US President

“Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of the Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits.”-- Sir Josiah Stamp (Chairman of the Bank of England in the 1920’s, and then the second richest man in Britain)

“The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”-- Thomas Jefferson, 3rd US President.


“When a bank lends it creates money out of nothing.”-- Mr. R. G. Hawtrey, previously Assistant Under Secretary to the British Treasury, in his “Trade Depression and the Way Out.”

When a bank lends, it creates credit. Against the advance, which it enters amongst its assets, there is a deposit entered in its liabilities. (This is ‘double-entry’ book-keeping.) But other lenders have not this mystical power of creating the means of payment out of nothing. What they lend must be money that they have acquired through their economic activities.”-- From his book, “The Art of Central Banking”, by Mr. R. G. Hawtrey.

“Banking is little more than book-keeping. It is a transfer of credit from one person to another. The transfer is by cheque. Cheques are currency (not legal tender). Currency is money.”-- The late Sir Edward Holden, an eminent British banker.

“There is no more unprofitable subject under the sun than to argue any banking or credit points, since there are enough substantial quotations in existence to prove to the initiated that banks do create credit without restraint.”-- The July, 1938, issue of ‘Branch Banking’, an English Bankers’ Journal.


“Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.”
-- James A. Garfield, 20th US President.

“In 1911 the Commonwealth Bank was established, not as a central bank to manage credit for the benefit of the community, but to compete with the private profit-making banks “whose gradual extinction, would follow as a matter of course.”-- A.G.L. Shaw, senior lecturer in History, University of Sydney. The Economic Development of Australia (Longmans 1944).

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.”
-- James Madison, 4th US President
“Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.”-- Thomas Jefferson, (Letter to Elbridge Gerry, Jan. 26, 1779).

Despite warnings, U.S. President Woodrow Wilson signed the 1913 U.S. Federal Reserve Act. A few years later he wrote: “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world, no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”-- Woodrow Wilson, 28th US President.

“Today in Australia, as in most other modem economics, all money is a debt of the banking system. When a banker grants a customer credit by overdraft, the bank ‘opens an account’ in its books and gives the client the right to draw funds without first having to put money into the account. But bank deposits only increase when the customer actually draws on the account to pay his creditors. In the case of loans, funds are deposited directly to the customer’s credit and results in an immediate increase n the volume of money. In either case the money supply increases as a result of the bank’s lending activities. As long as the debt remains outstanding the community’s quantity of money is increased.”-- An extract from the article, ‘Sources of Money,’ in the Bank of New South Wales Review, October 1978.

Whatever the Australian people can intelligently conceive in their minds and will loyally support, that can be done.” -- Sir Denison Miller, First Governor of the Commonwealth Bank, on the 7th July 1921, in response to a question at a press conference asking if he could issue credit free of usury in peace time, (as he had during the First World War) for construction of public projects.

“Any given piece of expenditure can be financed from one of four sources (or a combination of these sources)

(a) new savings;
(b) accumulated reserves;
(c) money borrowed, other than a bank;
(d) money borrowed from a bank.

“The last source differs from the first three because when money is lent by a bank it passes into the hands of the person who borrows it without anybody having less. Whenever a bank lends money there is, therefore, an increase in the total amount of money available.”
-- The former Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, and economic adviser to every Australian Prime Minister from the 1940’s until his death in the mid 90’s, Dr. H. C. Coombs, in the “E. S. & A. Research Address” at Queensland University on September 15, 1954.

“The process of creation of money by banks is still commonly described as involving ‘the deposit of money by customers with banks,’ which can then ‘lend out more money than they have,’ because some of the money they have lent out ‘comes back to them as deposits,’ Nowadays, it is a mischievous and very misleading description. It is misleading because it wrongly suggests;.

.(a) that notes and coin are, but deposits are not, money;
(b) that banks merely borrow and lend money created by someone else; and (c) that deposits come into existence primarily through bank customers paying in notes and coin, and only secondarily through bank lending.”
-- H. W. Arndt and C. P. Harris, in their textbook “The Australian Trading Banks”, clarify this further in a special appendix, “The Creation of Money”:

“This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial Banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the Banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon.”-- Robert H. Hemphill, (Credit Manager of Federal Reserve Bank, Atlanta, Ga., USA):

“I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create and destroy money. The amount of money in existence varies only with the action of the banks in increasing or decreasing deposits and bank purchases.”-- The Rt. Hon. Reginald McKenna, one time Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Chairman of the Midland Bank, (recorded in his book ‘Post War Banking’).

“The other important function which is exclusive to the banking system, is to create the community’s money supply, and to administer the monetary system. The two functions are intimately connected since modern money is created by banks in the process of granting credit.” (Note: To create means to produce out of nothing.)-- Professor Heinz Wolfgang Arndt, Professor of Economics at the National University, Canberra, writing on Banking in The New International Illustrated Encyclopaedia,’ (Vol. 1, page 321).

Research Links
« Last Edit: Sunday03July2011 by Spartakus » Logged

fergus2
Guest
« Reply #4 on: Sunday21March2010 »

Joyce fits very well into the Mad Galah mould. This is the same Keith Joyce who bankrupted and destroyed the Rockhampton RSL.  As a result of Joyce's Presidency and financial scheming the RSL lost everything.
 
Aye

Fergus

 
« Last Edit: Sunday21March2010 by Spartakus » Logged
Zion
Administrator
Active Member


Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 372


« Reply #3 on: Sunday21March2010 »

While AVM holds no confidential medical files on anybody, and thus we have never published what we do not hold, we do know that mad galah Keith Joyce deliberately, with malice and with clear intent used his access to the CONFIDENTIAL medical files of a respected Veteran to get back at this bloke and....how did he do it?

He was this Veterans advocate before the VRB. He did what the mad galahs falsely accuse AVM of.....Joyce published the CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL FILES of a TPI War Veteran. Yes that's right.

So, here we have the galahs complaining about AVM when they should be complaining about the atrocious behaviour of one of their own.

Joyce, hated and despised in his local community, is a level 4 DVA advocate who can represent members to the AAT and below. No wonder this bloke is so hated. Who would ever use him as a pensions officer, let alone an advocate.

« Last Edit: Sunday21March2010 by Spartakus » Logged

PQ
Active Member


Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 40


« Reply #2 on: Sunday21March2010 »

I believe that the emails being circulated by Peterson in an attempt to shut down access to National Archives and service files contain a deliberate and cunningly disguised piece of mis-information, by saying that your medical files can be accessed by anybody.

This is not true

A couple of years ago, I applied for and received wartime service files for two of my relatives. They contained enlistment documents, postings, pay scales, promotions, courses attended, overseas embarkation and return details, and a notification of hospital admittance and discharge . This notification of hospital did not mention the reason for admittance or any comment on medical conditions. (I know from family sources that it was for dengue fever, but you would never know that from the National Archives files). There was NO medical information at all.

Why would these Galahs deliberately lie, mislead and try and whip up veteran's outrage over access to their files?

Simple answer. They are ashamed of their own and some of their supporters "less than exemplary" service histories, they have bullshitted on about their heroic deeds (!) for years, and have now been found out by computer literate genuine veterans here at AVM and other websites, and exposed for the liars they are. Without any doubt, there are others who have not been found out yet and this is a last ditch effort to hide their past.

By resorting to telling deliberate lies in their campaign to block these files, they lose what shred of credibility they ever had.

Disgraceful.

Logged
fergus2
Guest
« Reply #1 on: Sunday21March2010 »


Jenny Bell vexatious nuisance

Mad Galah, Ms Jenny Bell, an ex civilian nurse from South Australia who has never served in the Defence Force and is not a ex service widow has stuck her less than erudite nose where it doesn’t belong again.

To say the least she must be unknowingly simple.  She had the temerity to email the DVA Minister about FOI Veterans matters with a complaint that is simply wrong.

She has weighed in to the FOI NAA Records debate citing her difficulty to acquire her deceased civilian husband’s medical records as an example.

Bell should understand that Defence Force Medical records cannot be accessed through the FOI legislation from NAA.  In addition it is not "A free for all" as charges apply for most service files acquired through FOI unless the file is read at the NAA premises.


Aye

Fergus


From: Allen Petersen
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 2:06 PM
Subject: NAA RECORDS PUBLIC FREE-FOR-ALL **POSTS

From: Jenny Bell
To:  Allen Petersen ; Alan Griffin MP ; Terry Westerway
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 7:17 AM
Subject: Re NAA RECORDS PUBLIC FREE-FOR-ALL

I don't understand why it is so easy to access those Military records, ...when for me to access my deceased husband's medical records,(who was not in the Military..but a private citizen) under FOI & The Privacy acts, means I have to jump through all sorts
of hoops, and produce a mountain of documentation, to  prove who I am,who he was, and what I want it for, (and pay for it all) to
do so ?  Beats me ...!!
 
Jenny Bell. SA
Logged
fergus2
Guest
« on: Sunday21March2010 »


Mad Galahs like most miscreants fear their past.


Allen Petersen the Mad Galah miscreant postman has chosen to send out a complaint about access to Defence Force Files, through Freedom of Information (FOI) legislation.  Petersen has a personal involvement in this because it was revealed that his Intelligence Quotient (SG rating) is well below average, proof of this is obvious by his association with the Mad Galahs and the letters of complaint he has received from people like the Department of Veterans Affairs Minister. Medical records cannot be accessed through this system, only administrative files. The SG rating is applied to enlistment documents as part of an applicants suitability for enlistment.

When the Mad Galahs formed from the Orange Movement, it became apparent that there must be a common denominator to bring these people together. Through access and perusal of their Defence Service, Administrative Files it was immediately evident that the common denominator was that they all failed as Defence Personnel, during their service they were either sacked, not promoted or not given the bravery medals they craved.

Corse, Briggs, Wiltshire, Westerway Tate, Joyce, Kirkman, Krikke, Holder, Muller and many others claim to represent more than a Million Veterans and regularly send ridiculous emails to Political leaders and advertise all over the world that the Australian Defence Force was, and still is a corrupt organization.  Mad Galahs have peccadilloes aplenty on their files giving ample evidence as to why their own ineptitude led them to less than satisfactory Defence Force service and why they now falsely blame the Defence Force for their failure.

The only way to combat the Mad Galah’s vile accusations made against Politicians, eminent Australians, other Veterans and the Defence Force generally is by the availability of information through the FOI legislation. This also applies to the dishonour of wannabes that the web site ANZMI expose.

It should also be noted that before release, any sensitive family information, personal medical problems are expunged from files, so that what is provided, basically refers to  postings and performance.

Military records are only a small sector of the FOI legislation and it stands to reason that if release of information about Service Files was taken from the legislation all other aspects of the FOI legislation would fall like dominoes and the openness of Australian society would suffer.

Do not support the blocking of the Service File aspect from the FOI legislation as the files provide the truth, and set back groups like the Mad Galahs and wannabes, right onto the area of their dishonourable gluteus maximus

Aye

Fergus

From: Allen Petersen
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 8:06 PM
Subject: NAA RECORDS IN PUBLIC FREE-FOR-ALL

 Courtesy Equal Justice For Troops Blog.

TROOPS PERSONAL RECORDS IN PUBLIC FREE-FOR-ALL

Equal Justice For Troops has recently been made aware of a significant oversight in the Archives Act 1983 which allows for the public to access all records of a Defence Force veteran so long as the records are over 30 years old; including confidential medical, psychological and performance reports. Compounding the issue, the defence force member would not be informed that their records have been accessed and are unable to know who has accessed them.

The Defence Force Welfare Association DFWA (responsible for bringing the issue to the attention of Equal Justice For Troops) has contacted relevant authorities and requested amendments to the Archives Act 1983. This was done after the association received a complaint from a concerned member of the public who had requested a relatives service records from the National Archives of Australia (NAA) and was sent, among other records, confidential medical reports.

Under s.5 of the Archives Act 1983, the NAA is vested with making Commonwealth records available to the public after 30 years. however, the legislation includes a number of exemptions that prohibit the release of certain records, notably:

s.33.1 (d) Information or matter the disclosure of which under this Act would constitute a breach of confidence;

s.33.1 (g) Information or matter the disclosure of which under this Act would involve the unreasonable disclosure of information relating to the personal affairs of any person (including a deceased person);

The problem that arises is that the legislation provides no clear definition for the terms "breach of confidence" or "personal affairs" and this ambiguity has led to the issue at hand. The implications of this are very concerning for both current and ex-serving members of the ADF. Contemporary Defence medical and psychological consultations are given in-confidence, as are many performance reports. Older records of the same kind, that may not have explicitly been given 'in-confidence', should no doubt be considered exempt from release as it would involve the unreasonable disclosure of the personal affairs of the member. If they are of the same nature as contemporary Defence in-confidence records then surely they should be given the same respect in terms of privacy. Even still, it is unclear whether the NAA would consider contemporary defence in-confidence records as exempt, given its stance regarding confidential personal medical records.

Most concerning is the public access to former defence personnel's psychological reports. In such consultations soldiers often speak of their fears, difficulties dealing with incidents whilst on deployment and occasionally dealing with post-traumatic stress or post-deployment stress disorder (PDSD). Allowing public access to these records is undoubtedly an unreasonable disclosure of a veteran's 'personal affairs' and a serious breach in the confidence a member has placed in the ADF. Unfortunately, due to the ambiguity of the legislation, the NAA does not seem to agree.

Whilst it would appear most current and ex-serving members feel quite strongly about protecting the privacy of their personal records, finding a suitable balance between veteran's privacy and the public's right to access Commonwealth archives is a more difficult issue. Should all records other than basic service details be regarded as 'personal affairs' and be prohibited from public access without the permission of the member concerned? Or should the exemption from access only extend to medical and psychological records and allow public access to confidential performance reports? Either way, it would be a vast improvement on the current open door policy, adopted by the NAA to all Defence personal records over 30 years of age.

The DFWA is still waiting for a response from the relevant authorities as to the rectification of this matter. Equal Justice For Troops will closely follow any developments in conjunction with the DFWA and will be ready to take further action to defend the privacy of veteran's personal records if the need arises.


Posted by Nicholas Brian Wiesener
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!